The Harrison Family
A ClearView Family Wealth Case Study
James Harrison is 42. He made partner at his law firm four years ago after fifteen years of grinding through the associate ranks. He earns $400,000 a year. He is good at his job, and he knows it. But he also knows that being good at law and being good with money are completely different skills.Sarah Harrison is 40. She leads marketing for a regional technology company, earns $100,000, and is the one who actually tracks the family's spending. She has had a spreadsheet for years. It just never quite told her what she actually needed to know.They have two children. Emma is seven and already has opinions about which college she wants to attend. Noah is two and has not yet developed opinions about his college plans, which James and Sarah regard as a small mercy.On paper, they are winning. Their household income is $500,000. Their net worth has crossed $1.8 million. They own a home they love in a neighborhood they chose carefully. They max their 401(k) plans. They have no consumer debt. By every conventional measure, they have done everything right.And yet.At a dinner party last fall, someone asked the group: "Do you think you could retire early if you wanted to?" James and Sarah exchanged a look across the table. They did not know. Not really. They had assumptions. They had rough mental math. But they did not actually know whether they were on track, what choices were truly available to them, or whether the life they were building was the one they actually wanted.They drove home mostly quiet. That was the night they decided to call ClearView.
The Harrisons at a Glance
$500K Household Income James $400K · Sarah $100K
$1.8M Combined Net Worth Across all assets
Age 60 Retirement Target Eighteen years away
$1.1M Invested in Retirement Accounts 401(k), Roth IRA, and Brokerage combined
$450K Home Equity
$0 Consumer Debt
What We Heard When We Really Listened
The first meeting at ClearView is not a financial meeting. It is a listening meeting.We do not lead with spreadsheets. We do not ask about risk tolerance. We do not start with asset allocation. We ask about life. What does a great week look like? What would you do differently if money were not a constraint? What keeps you up at night? What do you wish you knew?With James and Sarah, four themes emerged almost immediately.The college question was keeping them up at night. Emma was already seven. They could see college on the horizon. They had not opened a 529 plan for either child. Every time they thought about it, the numbers felt overwhelming and they moved on to something more pressing. The silence around this topic had become its own kind of stress.They wanted a vacation home more than almost anything else. For years, they had rented a house on the coast every summer. James had started half-jokingly calling it the rental tax. They wanted a place that was theirs. A place Emma and Noah would grow up coming back to. They were not sure if it was realistic. Nobody had ever told them one way or the other.James was quietly wondering if he could step back. Partner income was extraordinary. But the hours were not sustainable forever. James had started wondering whether he could shift to a counsel role that paid less and demanded less, and still be okay. He had never said this out loud to a financial advisor before. He was afraid of what the answer might be.The cash was bothering Sarah. They had $250,000 sitting in a savings account earning almost nothing. Sarah knew, intuitively, that this was wrong. She kept moving it to the mental "deal with later" pile. Nobody had ever built them a clear framework for what that money should actually be doing.What they wanted, underneath all of it, was not a better investment portfolio. They wanted to feel that their financial life was organized, purposeful, and working as hard as they were. They wanted to replace anxiety with information. They wanted to stop wondering and start knowing.
What the Harrisons Said They Wanted
Critical — Starting Now Ensure the family is protected if something happens to either of them. Stop guessing and actually know if they are on track.Critical — 11 to 18 Years Retire comfortably at age 60 on their own terms. Fund private college for both Emma and Noah.High Priority Purchase a vacation home on the coast within 5 to 7 years. Maintain an annual family travel budget of $20,000 or more.Important — 13 Years James to have the flexibility to step back to a counsel role by age 55.
Giving Every Dollar a Job
The foundation of everything at ClearView is cash flow. Not investments. Not taxes. Not estate planning. Cash flow first, because everything else depends on it.The exercise is simple in concept and almost always revelatory in practice. We build a complete map of where money comes from, where it goes, and whether the gap between those two things is being directed intentionally. For most high-earning families, it is not.For James and Sarah, this was the moment the conversation changed. Not because there were problems. But because seeing it all in one place, for the first time, with every goal attached to a specific number, made something abstract suddenly feel real and manageable.
Where Does $500,000 Actually Go?
$500K Gross Income
$339K After All Taxes Federal, state, and FICA
$199K Available for Goals After housing and living expenses
$10,450 Annual Surplus After every goal is fully funded
The Full Picture — Every Dollar Accounted For
$500,000 Gross Household Income
($161,000) Total Taxes Federal income $90,000 · FICA $26,000 · State and local $45,000
$339,000 Net Take-Home
($140,000) Housing and Lifestyle Household living expenses $120,000 · Annual travel and vacations $20,000
$199,000 Available for Goals
($188,550) Goals Funded 401(k) both spouses $46,000 · Backdoor Roth both spouses $14,000 · Taxable brokerage $92,500 · 529 Emma $15,750 · 529 Noah $9,200 · Vacation home fund $11,100
$10,450 Annual Surplus
37.7% Net Savings Rate As a percentage of gross income
With every goal funded systematically, the Harrisons have an annual surplus of approximately $10,450. That is a modest buffer, but it is a real one. More importantly, every goal now has a contribution rate, a timeline, and a probability of success attached to it. Nothing is left to chance or good intentions.
The most important shift was not numerical. It was psychological. For the first time, James and Sarah could see their income not as a pool of money to manage reactively, but as a system with direction, purpose, and destination.
Sarah described it this way: "We have always known we should be doing all of these things. Seeing that we actually can do all of them, at the same time, with money left over, was not what I expected."
Where the $188,550 in Annual Savings Goes
$152,500 Retirement 401(k), Roth IRA, and Brokerage — 80.9% of total savings
$24,950 College 529 plans for Emma and Noah — 13.2% of total savings
$11,100 Vacation Home Fund Down payment account — 5.9% of total savings
One issue was addressed immediately and forcefully. The $250,000 sitting in cash.
After establishing a proper emergency reserve of $60,000 — six months of household expenses in a high-yield savings account — the remaining $190,000 had no business sitting idle at a 0.5% interest rate. It was redeployed into the investment plan over three months using a systematic purchase schedule.
At a projected 7% average annual return, that single decision is expected to generate an additional $725,000 over twenty years, compared to roughly $210,000 if left in cash. The difference is over $500,000. The only thing required to capture it was a plan.
The Tax Opportunity Nobody Was Capitalizing On
The Harrisons are in the 32% federal marginal bracket. Every dollar of unnecessary taxes represents thirty-two cents that cannot compound for their family's future. When we completed the tax analysis, we identified five specific opportunities that were being missed every single year.A common misconception among high earners is that a large income means an inevitably large tax bill, full stop. That is partially true. But within any given income level, there is meaningful room to reduce the lifetime tax burden through deliberate, consistent planning. The Harrisons had been leaving real money on the table every year.
How the Harrison Household Is Actually Taxed
Federal only · Taxable income $424,000
10% First $23,850 taxed here $2,385 in tax
12% Next $73,100 taxed here $8,772 in tax
22% Next $109,750 taxed here $24,145 in tax
24% Next $187,900 taxed here $45,096 in tax
32% Last $29,400 taxed here $9,408 in tax — marginal rate
$77,050 Remaining before the 35% bracket
21.2% Effective Federal Rate The 32% bracket applies only to the last $29,400 earned — not to their full income. Understanding the difference between marginal and effective rate changes every planning conversation.
The Five Opportunities Being Missed
Backdoor Roth IRA Both Spouses — Every Year Non-deductible IRA contribution with immediate conversion, executed annually for both James and Sarah. Tax-free growth on $14,000 per year.
Asset Location Restructuring Where You Hold It Matters Bonds and REITs moved to tax-deferred accounts. Equities and index ETFs repositioned to taxable and Roth. $4,200 per year in avoided taxes.
Excess Cash Deployment $190,000 Put to Work Redeployed from 0.5% savings to a diversified low-cost portfolio over 90 days. $9,500 to $13,300 per year in additional growth.
Systematic Tax-Loss Harvesting Annual Taxable Account Review Losses harvested against realized gains each year. $3,000 to $6,000 per year in tax savings.
Qualified Charitable Strategy Donor-Advised Fund Designed for implementation at age 50 as the taxable account grows. Benefit to be determined at implementation.
The Tax Results in Three Numbers
18.0% Effective Federal Tax Rate On $500,000 gross, after 401(k) contributions
$8,200 Estimated Annual Tax Savings From asset location and harvesting combined
$164,000 Projected 20-Year Tax Savings From consistent, systematic planning
The backdoor Roth strategy deserves particular attention. At the Harrison household income, direct Roth IRA contributions are not permitted under current law. But the backdoor strategy — making a non-deductible traditional IRA contribution and immediately converting it to Roth — remains fully available and is one of the most valuable planning tools for high-income families.
$14,000 per year contributed via Backdoor Roth, growing at 7% annually over 18 years, is projected to reach approximately $470,000 at retirement. Unlike a traditional 401(k) or taxable brokerage, every dollar of that growth is withdrawn completely tax-free. At their marginal rate, this strategy is projected to generate roughly $150,000 in lifetime tax savings compared to holding the same amount in a taxable account. It takes about fifteen minutes per year to execute. The Harrisons had simply never been shown how.
$14,000 Contributed Each Year Via Backdoor Roth, both spouses combined
$470,000 Projected Value at Retirement Growing at 7% annually over 18 years
$150,000 Estimated Lifetime Tax Savings Compared to holding the same amount in a taxable account
The Risks Nobody Had Reviewed
James and Sarah had two young children, a significant mortgage, the highest-earning years of their lives ahead of them, and virtually no meaningful personal insurance review in six years. This section of the planning process was the one that made James visibly uncomfortable when we walked through the findings. For good reason.
Insurance Gap Analysis
Life Insurance — James Currently $1,000,000 group term only Needed $5,000,000 or more · Critical Gap
Life Insurance — Sarah Currently $500,000 group term only Needed $2,000,000 total · Gap Identified
Disability Insurance — James Currently 60% group LTD, capped at $15,000 per month Needed $20,000 per month own-occupation · Critical Gap
Disability Insurance — Sarah Currently 60% group LTD Needed review of group plus individual supplement · Review Needed
Umbrella Liability Currently none in place Needed $3,000,000 minimum · Not in Place
Long-Term Care Planning Currently none in place Action: model and evaluate at age 50
The life insurance gap was the most urgent finding, and the most important to understand clearly. James earns $400,000 per year. If he were to die tomorrow, Sarah would receive $1,000,000 from his group life policy. That sounds substantial. But at a conservative 4% withdrawal rate, $1,000,000 generates $40,000 per year in income. That is one-tenth of what the family currently lives on, with a seven-year-old and a two-year-old at home, a mortgage, and two college educations ahead.
The standard guidance for high-income earners is 10 to 15 times annual income in life insurance. For James, that means $4,000,000 to $6,000,000 in total coverage. He had $1,000,000. A 20-year term policy providing $4,000,000 in additional coverage for a healthy 42-year-old male costs approximately $3,200 to $4,800 per year. For less than the cost of two weekend trips, the family's financial future is protected. It is one of the most cost-effective decisions in this entire plan.
The disability finding was equally sobering. A 42-year-old is statistically more likely to experience a long-term disability before age 65 than to die. James's group policy is capped at $15,000 per month. His income generates over $33,000 per month. An individual own-occupation disability policy covering the additional $5,000 per month was placed within 60 days of the engagement.
An umbrella liability policy was also established immediately. As a law firm partner, James's professional and personal liability exposure is significant. A $3,000,000 umbrella was obtained for approximately $450 per year. In terms of risk-adjusted value per dollar spent, it is one of the best decisions in the plan.
$5,500,000 Life Insurance Added $4,000,000 term for James and $1,500,000 term for Sarah · Approximately $5,600 per year combined
$5,000/mo Disability Gap Closed Individual own-occupation policy for James · Approximately $3,350 per year
$3,000,000 Umbrella Liability Full personal and professional liability coverage · Approximately $450 per year
Protection Plan — What Was Put in Place
$5,500,000 Life Insurance Added $4,000,000 term for James · $1,500,000 term for Sarah · Approximately $5,600 per year combined
$5,000/mo Disability Gap Closed Individual own-occupation policy for James · Approximately $3,350 per year
$3,000,000 Umbrella Liability Full personal and professional liability coverage · Approximately $450 per year
RetryCopyExport to PDFHelpfulNot helpful
Who Gets What, and Who Decides
When we asked James and Sarah whether they had wills, they both said yes immediately. When we asked to review them, they discovered the wills had been drafted nine years ago, before Emma was born, named no guardian for their children, and had beneficiary designations that still listed their individual estates rather than each other.This is one of the most common serious vulnerabilities we find when working with families who have young children. A will that does not name a guardian is, in the worst possible scenario, a document that leaves one of the most consequential decisions in your children's lives to a judge who has never met your family.The Harrisons' 401(k) and IRA beneficiary designations named their individual estates as primary beneficiaries. This means in the event of simultaneous death, those assets would be subject to probate, potentially delayed for years, and distributed without the protections of a trust for their minor children. It is an extraordinarily common oversight. It was corrected within the first 90 days of the engagement at a cost of essentially nothing beyond the time required to update a form.Working with an estate planning attorney, a comprehensive estate plan was completed and executed in full.Revocable Living Trusts were established for both James and Sarah, ensuring their assets pass outside of probate according to their exact wishes, with professional trustee provisions if needed.Pour-over wills were drafted to direct any assets not titled in the trust at death to flow into it, preventing anything from falling outside the plan.Guardianship designations formally named Sarah's sister and brother-in-law as primary guardians for Emma and Noah, with James's brother designated as alternate.Durable powers of attorney were established for both spouses, enabling financial decisions to be made on their behalf in the event of incapacity.Healthcare directives and HIPAA authorizations were completed, ensuring that medical decisions will reflect their values and that the right people have legal authority to act.Beneficiary designations were updated across all 401(k) accounts, Roth IRAs, and life insurance policies to properly coordinate with the revocable trust structure.A personal letter of intent was drafted documenting their values, their wishes for how their children should be raised, and their guidance for the people they trust most.The total cost of the estate plan was approximately $4,500. At the signing appointment, Sarah cried. Not because the documents were emotional in an abstract way, but because she realized she had been carrying a quiet, unspoken fear about what would happen to her children for years. Having an actual answer to that question felt, in her words, like putting down something heavy she had been carrying for a very long time.
Investments as the Servant, Not the Master
In most financial relationships, the investment conversation happens first. At ClearView, it comes last. Not because investments are unimportant, but because without the plan that comes before them, investments are simply numbers without context. Money without a job.For the Harrisons, the investment conversation was actually straightforward once everything else was in place. They were not starting from zero. They had $1.1 million already deployed across their accounts. The work was not to build a portfolio from scratch. It was to ensure what they had was organized to serve the plan they had just built.Three decisions made a material difference.Asset location. Where you hold an investment matters nearly as much as what you hold. Bonds and REITs generate ordinary income taxed at the highest marginal rates. Holding them inside tax-deferred accounts eliminates that drag entirely. Broad equity index funds generate qualified dividends and long-term capital gains taxed at preferential rates, making them well-suited for the taxable brokerage account. The Harrison portfolio was restructured around this principle in approximately ninety days, with an estimated annual tax savings of $4,200 going forward.Redeploying the idle $190,000. The excess cash was addressed directly. $60,000 was formally designated as the Harrison emergency reserve and moved to a high-yield savings account. The remaining $190,000 was invested in a low-cost, tax-efficient equity portfolio over three months using a systematic purchase schedule to reduce timing risk. At a projected 7% average annual return, this money is expected to reach approximately $725,000 over 20 years. In cash, it would have produced approximately $210,000 over the same period. The difference is over $500,000. The only thing required to capture it was making a decision.Organizing investments around goals. Rather than managing a single undifferentiated pool of money, the Harrison portfolio was organized into goal-specific buckets. Retirement accounts are invested for long-term growth in a 70/30 equity-to-bond allocation, shifting to 60/40 as they approach age 55. The taxable account is structured for tax efficiency with broad low-cost index ETFs. The vacation home fund is invested conservatively in short-term bonds and a high-yield account to preserve capital for a five to seven year deployment window. The 529 plans use age-based equity portfolios calibrated to each child's enrollment timeline.
How Each Account Serves the Plan
401(k) — Both Spouses Bonds, REITs, and value funds. Tax drag fully eliminated inside a sheltered wrapper.Roth IRA — Both Spouses Small cap and international equity. Highest-growth assets held in the only fully tax-free account.Taxable Brokerage Broad index ETFs. Tax-efficient, harvestable, and accessible without restriction.529 Plans Age-based equity funds. Matched to each child's enrollment timeline.Vacation Home Fund Short-term bonds and high-yield savings. Capital preservation with full liquidity.
Portfolio Projection
Starting from $1.1 million today, investing $152,500 per year
Age 42 Starting Point $1,100,000 across all three scenarios
Age 47 Five Years In $2,100,000 conservative · $2,300,000 base case · $2,500,000 optimistic
Age 52 Ten Years In $3,400,000 conservative · $4,000,000 base case · $4,500,000 optimistic
Age 57 Fifteen Years In $5,000,000 conservative · $6,200,000 base case · $7,200,000 optimistic
Age 60 At Retirement Target $6,100,000 conservative · $8,000,000 base case · $9,600,000 optimistic
$6,250,000 Retirement Target Based on a 4% safe withdrawal rate on $250,000 per year in income
Because the Harrisons already had $1.1 million invested when the plan was built, all three scenarios cross the $6.25 million retirement target well before age 60. In the base case, they reach their minimum retirement number at approximately age 56. That is four years ahead of the target they had in mind when they first called.
Six Months Later
When James and Sarah returned for their six-month review, something had changed. Not the markets. Not their income. Something harder to quantify but more important.Sarah said it simply: "I stopped dreading talking about money."James was more specific: "I spent fifteen years building a career that would give my family financial security. The irony is I never actually checked whether we were secure. I always assumed the answer was yes and hoped I was right. Now I actually know. That is a completely different feeling."
Before and After — What the Plan Answered
Can we afford private college for both kids? Before: We hope so. No 529s opened. After: Yes. $15,750 per year for Emma, $9,200 for Noah. Both on track.
Can we buy a vacation home? Before: Maybe someday. No plan. After: Yes. Saving $11,100 per year. Purchase window is Year 5 to 7.
Can we retire at 60? Before: We assume so. Never modeled it. After: Yes, and the base case hits the target four years early, at 56.
Could James step back at 55? Before: Impossible. We need every dollar. After: Yes, with modest adjustments. The plan supports it clearly.
Are we paying too much in taxes? Before: Probably. Nobody has reviewed it. After: Saving $8,200 per year now. Projected $164,000 or more over 20 years.
What is the $250,000 in cash for? Before: Nothing specific. Just there. After: $60,000 emergency reserve. $190,000 redeployed and working.
Are the kids protected if something happens? Before: Inadequately. Wills outdated, no guardians named. After: Fully protected. Trusts, guardians, and all insurance in place.
Are we actually on track? Before: We hope we are. After: Yes. And now we can prove it.
The Results
4 Years Early Retirement Target Reached Base case hits $6.25M at age 56, not 60
Both Kids Funded College Savings Running Separate goal-based 529 timelines for Emma and Noah
$5.5M Added Protection Put in Place Life, disability, and umbrella coverage across both spouses
Complete Estate Plan Executed Trusts, wills, guardians, and directives all in place
The question James asked at the six-month review said more than any spreadsheet could. "Is there anything keeping me from taking a lower-billing counsel role at 55 if I want to?"
The answer was: not much. If he increased his savings rate modestly over the next seven years, the plan supported a significant income reduction at 55 with no material impact on retirement security. It was specific. It was actionable. It was not the vague "you need to keep earning what you earn" answer he had quietly feared.
That is what planning does. It replaces anxiety with information. It replaces assumptions with actual answers. And it replaces the quiet dread of not knowing with something that feels, for families like the Harrisons, almost revolutionary.
Clarity.
One year later, the Harrisons purchased a property on the coast in the spring. Not the vacation home they had dreamed about for years, but a smaller place they could afford now while the down payment fund grows. They call it the starter. Emma calls it the beach house. Noah has not yet developed an opinion. James billed fewer hours in April than any month in the previous four years. He did not worry about it once.
Is This Your Family?
The Harrisons are not unusual. We work with families like theirs every week. High earners who are doing most things right, whose financial lives have simply never been organized around a coherent plan. Families with assumptions where they should have answers. Families who are winning by every conventional measure and still cannot quite articulate why they feel uncertain.If you read this and thought, at any point, "that sounds like us" — that feeling is worth paying attention to.The first conversation at ClearView costs nothing and commits you to nothing. It is a listening meeting. We want to understand your life, your goals, and what financial clarity would actually mean for your family.The families who benefit most from this kind of planning are not the ones with problems. They are the ones who are already successful and want to make sure that success is working as hard as they are.Reach out directly at Reggie@clearviewfw.com or schedule a no-obligation 30-minute call at calendly.com/reggie-clearviewfw/30min. The first conversation costs nothing and commits you to nothing. It is simply a chance to talk about your life, your goals, and whether this kind of planning makes sense for your family.
This case study is a composite illustration created for educational and marketing purposes. The Harrison family is not a real client. Any resemblance to actual persons is coincidental. All financial figures, projections, and scenarios are illustrative only and are based on assumed rates of return and planning assumptions that may differ materially from actual results. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Tax projections are estimates and do not constitute tax advice; consult a qualified CPA. Insurance recommendations are illustrative; actual coverage, premiums, and eligibility vary based on individual health and circumstances. Estate planning scenarios are illustrative; consult a qualified estate planning attorney licensed in your state. ClearView Family Wealth is a registered investment advisor. This material does not constitute an offer to provide investment advisory or financial planning services.
